sha1 pgp fingerprint

Damien Goutte-Gattat dgouttegattat at
Thu Jan 26 11:20:58 CET 2017

On 01/26/2017 12:47 AM, sivmu wrote:
> The question I have not yet found any clear answer for, is why is nobody
> talking about this and should pgp keys be identified by a stronger hash
> alogrithm in the future?

People *do* talk about this. But a change of the hash algorithm used for 
fingerprinting keys cannot be decided unilateraly by GnuPG developers. 
All OpenPGP implementations have to agree on such a change, that's why 
the discussions occur on the IETF OpenPGP mailing list.

See for example those threads:

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20170126/12d85cde/attachment.sig>

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list