? Comments re key servers? re gpg-encrypted mail? re key servers carry many phony keys?

[Miroslav Rovis]

This mail is already at:
https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2017-January/057582.html
( and this is a reply to: Message-ID: <20170130234222.GA14408 at g0n.xdwgrp> )
but when you server with Microsoft... well, it's not very reliable ( 80%
of Croatia is occupied by one provider and they serve mail and all with
IIS. Heaven fall on us from shame! )

On 170131-00:42+0100, Miroslav Rovis wrote:
...
> It's this repo, where the latest two tags are PGP-signed:
> https://github.com/Synzvato/decentraleyes/tags
> 
...
> gpg --keyserver hkp://pgp.mit.edu --recv-key CECC45E1E979013C
> gpg --keyserver hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-key CECC45E1E979013C 
> 
...
> Can anybody check if maybe they can get that key from the keyservers?

Sorry for the digression...
-- 
Miroslav Rovis
Zagreb, Croatia
http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20170131/d9552409/attachment.sig>