Key corruption: duplicate signatures and usage flags
martin f krafft
madduck at madduck.net
Thu Jun 22 13:22:46 CEST 2017
Hey Justus, thanks for writing in. Here are the answers you wanted:
> gpg --version please?
> > So far, so good. Do note the [SC] usage flags.
> What are the capabilities of your primary key supposed to be?
There were [SC] when I created it, but I've recently changed to
a signing subkey and removed the flag from the primary key.
> > key 55C9882D999BBCC4:
> > 24 duplicate signatures removed
> > That's a bit weird. Where do these come from?
> Not sure, but anyone can append stuff to your key on the keyservers.
> Maybe some faulty software reordered the packages and uploaded it?
Yeah could be. And while there's no way this can be fixed, it also
doesn't really harm, does it?
@martinkrafft | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
"getting a scsi chain working is perfectly simple if you remember that
there must be exactly three terminations: one on one end of the
cable, one on the far end, and the goat, terminated over the scsi
chain with a silver-handled knife whilst burning *black* candles."
-- anthony deboer
spamtraps: madduck.bogus at madduck.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 1118 bytes
Desc: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
More information about the Gnupg-users