Key corruption: duplicate signatures and usage flags

MFPA 2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net
Fri Jun 23 00:33:24 CEST 2017


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512



On Thursday 22 June 2017 at 12:22:46 PM, in
<mid:20170622112246.arbty4jkgcubelwf at albatross.lehel.madduck.net>,
martin f krafft wrote:-


> There were [SC] when I created it, but I've recently
> changed to
> a signing subkey and removed the flag from the
> primary key.

I didn't know you could remove a usage flag once the key was on the
keyservers. And I thought GnuPG would automatically sign with a valid
signing subkey if there was one.


- --
Best regards

MFPA                  <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net>

INFLATION: Cutting money in half without damaging the paper.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=aY7r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list