TOFU

[MFPA]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512



On Wednesday 21 June 2017 at 7:49:42 PM, in
<mid:ffb9b23c-b01b-44d0-3a75-6e5e474de196 at digitalbrains.com>, Peter
Lebbing wrote:-

> I think it's a bad UX choice to
> name an invalid
> signature "UNTRUSTED Good" and a valid signature
> "Good". I think it
> suggests they both have some credibility, which is a
> false suggestion.

I thought "good signature" just meant the message has not been
altered in transit.

- --
Best regards

MFPA                  <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net>

Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=7Vky
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----