Security doubts on 3DES default

Kristian Fiskerstrand kristian.fiskerstrand at sumptuouscapital.com
Mon Mar 13 16:15:18 CET 2017


On 03/13/2017 01:47 PM, Ryru wrote:
> Is my understanding correct or do I miss an important fact? What are
> your thoughts about this behaviour?

See section 13.2 of RFC4880, fyi the behavior changes in the context of
RFC6637.

My thoughts; concerns about 3DES are premature. The focus on algorithms
in general likely so, the likelihood of operational security being the
issue is far greater

-- 
----------------------------
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Blog: https://blog.sumptuouscapital.com
Twitter: @krifisk
----------------------------
Public OpenPGP keyblock at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
----------------------------
Qui audet vincit
Who dares wins

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20170313/5ed141a1/attachment.sig>


More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list