Garbled data in keyservers
stefan.claas at posteo.de
Sun Dec 9 21:13:51 CET 2018
On Sun, 09 Dec 2018 20:55:36 +0100, Dirk Gottschalk wrote:
> That I mentioned in the other reply I have sent a few seconds ago.
> > right? A key which would bear a CA sig would imho not have such
> > additional and funny UID's or sigs, because it would make the key
> > owner look a bit stupid, i would say.
> No. The signatures on a key are nor related to each other. A funni
> signature could be backdated before the signature by the CA were made.
> Who's the stupid now, in the eyes of the user seeing this? ^^
Do you really think a user with a CA sig would do that, with my
proposals i have made?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
More information about the Gnupg-users