Modernizing Web-of-trust for Organizations

[Kristian Fiskerstrand]

On 01/04/2018 11:14 PM, Lou Wynn wrote:
> Compared to using two CAs, my design introduces two properties to a
> certificate. One is the certificate type, which is "p" for a partner and
> "e" for an employee.

why not make it compatible with rfc4880 directly? your proposal would
require client handling of e.g notation data?

-- 
----------------------------
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Blog: https://blog.sumptuouscapital.com
Twitter: @krifisk
----------------------------
Public OpenPGP keyblock at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
----------------------------
Amantes sunt amentes
Lovers are lunatics

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/attachments/20180104/944bf5ea/attachment.sig>