Slightly OT - i need the proper wording for a signed document

[Juergen BRUCKNER]

Hello Dirk,

Am 02.11.18 um 15:20 schrieb Dirk Gottschalk via Gnupg-users:
> You mean, you "tampered" with the file and the signature is still
> valid? Are you sure? Then Adome does sometging really bad, IMHO.
> 
> Such a signature should ensure that the file is unmodified completely.
> otherwise somebody can modify it in a way that could be used as a
> backdoor to the signature, at least in theory.

That is correct, that a signature is valid if there is added a timestamp
AFTER sign the document. Very simplified it uses the same method for
timestamping as for signing, and it is a kind of 2nd signature on the
same document. the document is NOT altered or manipulated.

regards
Juergen

-- 
Juergen M. Bruckner
juergen at bruckner.tk

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3894 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/attachments/20181102/d4e073e1/attachment.bin>