[openssl-users] OpenSSL vs GPG for encrypting files? Security best practices?

[Nicholas Papadonis]

Interesting.  How about this for a start?

http://nickpapadonis.com/images-share/summerian-ancient-mesopotamia-ancient-lock.jpg
http://nickpapadonis.com/images-share/anunnaki1.jpg
http://nickpapadonis.com/images-share/summerian-Winged_Human-headed_Bulls.JPG

On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 7:21 PM openssl at foocrypt.net <openssl at foocrypt.net>
wrote:

> Hi Nick
>
> Have You tried The FooKey Method ? https://foocrypt.net/the-fookey-method
>
> Also,
>
> I will be sourcing public addendum's as addendum's to my submission into
> the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security [
> https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Intelligence_and_Security/TelcoAmendmentBill2018/Submissions
> ] regarding the committee’s review of the 'Telecommunication and Other
> Legislation Amendment (Assistance and Access) Bill 2018' after the
> Melbourne Cup. It will be similar to the open request for the Defence Trade
> Control Act review performed by the former Inspector General of
> Intelligence, Dr Vivian Thom.
>
>
> https://foocrypt.net/independent-review-of-the-defence-trade-controls-act-2012-cth-call-for-information-for-submission-as-a-case-study-from-the-openssl-community
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Mark A. Lane
>
> Cryptopocalypse NOW 01 04 2016
>
> Volumes 0.0 -> 10.0 Now available through iTunes - iBooks @
> https://itunes.apple.com/au/author/mark-a.-lane/id1100062966?mt=11
>
> Cryptopocalypse NOW is the story behind the trials and tribulations
> encountered in creating "FooCrypt, A Tale of Cynical Cyclical Encryption."
>
> "FooCrypt, A Tale of Cynical Cyclical Encryption." is aimed at hardening
> several commonly used Symmetric Open Source Encryption methods so that they
> are hardened to a standard that is commonly termed 'QUANTUM ENCRYPTION'.
>
> "FooCrypt, A Tale of Cynical Cyclical Encryption." is currently under
> export control by the Australian Department of Defence Defence Export
> Controls Office due to the listing of Cryptology as a ‘Dual Use’ Technology
> as per the ‘Wassenaar Arrangement’
>
> A permit from Defence Export Control is expected within the next 2 months
> as the Australian Signals Directorate is currently assessing the associated
> application(s) for export approval of "FooCrypt, A Tale of Cynical Cyclical
> Encryption."
>
> Early releases of "Cryptopocalypse NOW" will be available in the period
> leading up to June, 2016.
>
> Limited Edition Collectors versions and Hard Back Editions are available
> via the store on http://www.foocrypt.net/
>
> © Mark A. Lane 1980 - 2016, All Rights Reserved.
> © FooCrypt 1980 - 2016, All Rights Reserved.
> © FooCrypt, A Tale of Cynical Cyclical Encryption. 1980 - 2016, All Rights
> Reserved.
> © Cryptopocalypse 1980 - 2016, All Rights Reserved.
>
>
>
> On 5 Nov 2018, at 10:35, Nicholas Papadonis <nick.papadonis.ml at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Comments
>
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 5:56 PM Bear Giles <bgiles at coyotesong.com> wrote:
>
>> > I'm considering encrypting a tar archive and optionally a block file
>> system (via FUSE) using either utility
>>
>> Linux has good support for encrypted filesystems. Google LUKS.
>>
>
>
>> BTW a tar file starts with the name of the first entry. The 'magic
>> numbers' are at offset 128 or so. However a compressed tar file will start
>> with a known value since gzip, b2zip, and 7zip?, all start with their magic
>> values.
>>
>
> Does tar placing known data at a certain offset increase the probability
> that someone can perform an attack easier?  They may already know the data
> to decrypt at that offset and if the encrypted block overlaps, then the
> attack is easier.
>
> Thanks
> --
> openssl-users mailing list
> To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/attachments/20181107/02e95bc2/attachment.html>