Conflict Due to Multiple Instances of Smart Card Daemon
wk at gnupg.org
Thu May 23 11:53:13 CEST 2019
On Wed, 22 May 2019 00:21, gnupg-users at gnupg.org said:
> work without requring removal/re-insertion of the card, but presumably
> such a change has security implications or the original developers
> would not have used PCSC_SHARE_EXCLUSIVE. So... I don't know if such a
> change is advisable. Any feedback on that? I'm thinking that it may
Don't. We are currently working on autoswitching between different
applications on the card and thus a controlling instance is required. A
second daemon (ie. using a second GNUPGHOME) on the same reader is thus
not a good idea.
FWIW, scdameon handles several readers just fine.
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Gnupg-users