A place for discussing WKD spec clarifications?

Daniel Kahn Gillmor dkg at fifthhorseman.net
Sat Nov 9 21:39:15 CET 2019

On Tue 2019-10-22 21:28:53 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On Thu 2019-10-17 11:08:46 +0000, Bjarni Runar Einarsson wrote:
>> Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg at fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
>>> I'd be happy to set up such a tracker at (say)
>>> https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/web-key-directory/issues if folks
>>> are OK with it.
>>> Werner, does that sound OK to you?
>> This sounds good to me, but I agree it's important Werner is
>> onboard.
> Werner, can you give some indication of whether this sounds reasonable
> to you?  This is an important spec, and i'd like to have a place where
> we can keep track of implementer concerns.

I spoke with Werner about this last week, and he agreed that gitlab was
a reasonable place for the discussion.

I've just set up https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/webkey-directory for this
purpose -- it has an issue tracker and a proposed git repo (though it is
of course up to Werner whether he wants to use that git repo or keep
with the gnupg-docs repo for this draft).

I'll follow up with more details on openpgp at ietf.org, because i think
this draft is important for the entire OpenPGP ecosystem, not just

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/attachments/20191109/e8364f72/attachment.sig>

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list