NO_SECKEY difference between 2.2 and 2.3

Aleksander Machniak alec at
Tue Nov 21 15:28:46 CET 2023

On 21.11.2023 14:59, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
>> When I do --decrypt on an encrypted email message (having only
>> recipient's private+public key in the keyring):
>> - v2.2 outputs one NO_SECKEY line referring the recipient's key
> Referring to the recipient's key? I understood that you do have the
> recipient's key but that you lack the sender's key.

Yes, that's right. I don't need a sender's key to decrypt a message.

>> - v2.3 outputs two NO_SECKEY lines referring both recipient's and
>> sender's keys.
>> Is this expected behavior change?
> Maybe not, but 2.3.3 is more than 2 years old. Current is 2.4.3.

That's what I have on Alma Linux 9 by default. I'll take a look for an 

Aleksander Machniak
Kolab Groupware Developer        []
Roundcube Webmail Developer  []
PGP: 19359DC1 # Blog:

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list