Opengpg smartcard specs for kyber (PQC) algorithm

[Pyromania]

On Sun, May 25 2025, Todd Zullinger via Gnupg-users <gnupg-users at gnupg.org> wrote:

> I think the Pyromania's question was because:

>     .Service != .socket

Yes.  Thanks.

> It seems reasonable to mask both the .service and .socket
> units if they exist.  While the .service might only be
> socket activated, if you know you don't ever want it to be
> started, masking it won't hurt.  At worst, it's mild
> overkill.

I was thinking so.  Thank you.

-- 
English is not my native/mother language.  While I can read and
understand English fluently, I have problems expressing my thoughts
in it.  Please, bear with me.  Sincerely, Pyromania.

PGP fingerprint = 2B24 291E 0637 4D2E 0D14  9EFC D7B3 10D4 5C9D 5892

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1304 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/attachments/20250526/a3cb6fcc/attachment-0001.sig>