Thoughts on PQC
Robert J. Hansen
rjh at sixdemonbag.org
Tue Apr 14 14:49:12 CEST 2026
> Actually, krytrons were an existing technology from high speed photography
According to the sources I've seen they were descended from military
thyratrons, and were unknown prior to the mid-1940s. Wikipedia says they
originated as one of the first products of the EG&G Corporation,
established in 1947.
> Exploding bridgewires was also an existing technology used in "proximity
> fuse" secret artillery shells.
According to John Coster-Mullens' excellent _Atom Bombs: The Top Secret
Inside Story of Little Boy and Fat Man_, EBWs were invented by future
Nobel laureate Luis Alvarez and Lawrence Johnston specifically for use
in early implosion weapons.
> Explosive lenses was the existing technology in certain destruction
> charges used by special forces and anti-tank weapons.
The first patent on explosive lenses is credited to John von Neumann,
James Tuck, and Seth Neddermeyer.
Tuck's declassified CV from Los Alamos credits him as having devised the
explosive lens in 1944.
https://ahf.nuclearmuseum.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/JamesTuck%20-%20C.V.pdf
Looking over Wikipedia's page on explosive lenses, no mention is made of
its use in antitank weapons or demolition charges.
If you have contradictory sources I'd be happy to hear of it.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 236 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/attachments/20260414/5dff7170/attachment.sig>
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list