Re: Question about cryptographically keyed GDSS — is this known?

[Robert J. Hansen]

> I'm not sure if this method is already known, already tried, or if there 
> is an obvious reason why it wouldn't work that I'm overlooking.
> 
> Does anyone know anything about this ?

I strongly encourage people to work on what interests them, so if this 
interests you, go for it! Seriously! Have fun with it!

Here's why it doesn't interest me: it's another attempt to turn a 
steganographic system into a cryptographic system. History has shown 
this to be generally unwise. Instead of doing everything in one pass 
it's generally safer to encrypt what needs encrypting, then send that 
over a steganographic channel.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 236 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/attachments/20260302/8c73fca6/attachment.sig>