What do LLMs mean for GnuPG?

[Jacob Bachmeyer]

On 3/30/26 08:27, Hakun_the_eril via Gnupg-users wrote:
> I agree that actual code for ciphers must be 100% written by humans, 
> and reviewed by humans,-  but for everything else it can be a OK tool.

No, no, no, no, and NO!

Anything in the same process space where private or symmetric keys are 
handled is no less sensitive than the cipher implementation itself.

Yes, this means lots of programs have really bad architectures for 
handling cipher keys.


-- Jacob