<html><div><font size="2" face="Arial">Hello,</font></div><div><font size="2" face="Arial"><br></font></div><div><font size="2" face="Arial">after looking into DKIM details, I started searching, why the same procedure cannot be used for gpg?</font></div><div><font size="2" face="Arial">With gpg a lot of people from get confused, when they receive signed mails either because of the </font><code>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----</code><font size="2" face="Arial"> strings, or because the unknown attachments in MIME message.</font></div><div><font size="2" face="Arial"><br></font></div><div><font size="2" face="Arial">When now looking to DKIM, this looks much more advanced. There is a Header in the mail, containing the signature all details to the signature and information about header items included in the signature:<br></font></div><div><font face="Courier New" size="3">DKIM-Signature: v=1;
a=ed25519-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;<br> d=domain.top; s=key123; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:<br> Subject:To:Message-ID:From:Date;<br> bh=GXC7VV/p5oCw1rk9iGc/6RziLwTkT4pwkoJLPQAV5Aw=; b=OtHgC7JByI7ZVzkZWKT6OUJfGl<br> +pEkQtcKDEi6g2N0qxBxiTcSnumpa7BT5J9ExoaWiLpjmLkhirtQHt48cLAA==;</font><font face="Courier New" size="3"><br></font></div><div><font size="2" face="Arial">Is somethings similar available for GPG/PGP?</font></div><div><font size="2" face="Arial"><br></font></div><div><font size="2" face="Arial">Currently I found nothing, but I expect that this could help for much better acceptance for signed mails. Receivers, who don't know anything about gpg getting not confused, as the
Header is totally invisible.</font></div><div><font size="2" face="Arial">With such an implementation I would start again sending all my mails automatically signed, as I have not longer to answer questions about my weird looking mails.<br></font></div><div><font size="2" face="Arial"><br></font></div><div><font size="2" face="Arial">If someone could provide me with information, if such header implementations are already somewhere discussed, I would be glad.<br></font></div></html>