why gnutls when we have openssl?
wk at gnupg.org
Thu Aug 23 16:08:01 CEST 2001
On 23 Aug 2001 09:30:11 -0400, Dan Winship said:
> People use this example a lot, but it's not true. Microsoft made
> proprietary extensions to the Kerberos *specification* (RFC 1510), not
> to any existing Kerberos implementation. When the first interoperability
[You have seen the source?]
> testing between MIT and Microsoft kerberos was done, the two
> implementations had different bugs, so it's unlikely they used any
> significant amount of the MIT code at all.
They could have done this and in fact the first TCP/IP implementions
where heavily based on BSD code.
Werner Koch Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur
g10 Code GmbH et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est.
Privacy Solutions -- Augustinus
More information about the Gnutls-devel