[gnutls-dev] Re: Intent to implement DTLS
nmav at gnutls.org
Mon May 9 13:31:48 CEST 2005
On Monday 09 May 2005 12:06, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> 2) "Fix" the current code by (re)introducing a clean separation between
> the handshake, record and transport layer, and remove the bias towards
> TCP. This means adding DTLS on top of it will be painless and there
> won't be lots of code duplication. However it will touch a lot of
> existing code.
I think this is the best approach to use. But what kind of separation between
the layers do you need? In what sense they are not separated?
More information about the Gnutls-devel