[gnutls-dev] Starting Guile integration
ludo at chbouib.org
Wed Jun 6 17:22:08 CEST 2007
Simon Josefsson <simon at josefsson.org> writes:
> Would it work to move GUILE_PROGS + GUILE_FLAGS down into the else-case?
> Yes -- otherwise people who don't have guile.m4 on their systems will
> get the above error when they build from CVS. And we don't want to
> require that guile is installed in order to bootstrap gnutls.
>> There are still a couple of minor glitches:
>> * Code in `guile/src' doesn't want to be compiled with
>> `-Wstrict-prototypes'. Since adding `-Wno-strict-prototypes'
>> doesn't annul the effect of `-Wstrict-prototypes', I'm afraid we'll
>> have to remove `-Wstrict-prototypes' at the project level (i.e, in
>> `configure.in'), and add it to `CFLAGS' in sub-directories where it
>> makes sense.
> Ouch. What is the reason the code needs this? Maybe we can fix that
> problem instead. It seems to build for me now, though, with warnings,
> but I'd rather have warning messages than potentially hiding other
I fixed this by tweaking `AM_CFLAGS' (see Git log for details, commit
> It may be possible to re-define the function index somehow, perhaps we
> could ask on the texinfo list about this. I think it would be cleaner
> to have a separate C API index and Scheme API index. Although it is not
> important to fix this before the first releases.
After reading `(texinfo.gz)Functions Commands' and related nodes, I
couldn't find a way to do this. It seems that the `@def*' macros cannot
be instructed to use a specific index.
>> For some reason, `make' now fails here in `doc/reference':
>> $ make -C doc/reference/
>> make: Entering directory `/home/ludo/src/gnutls/doc/reference'
>> gtk-doc: Scanning header files
>> gtk-doc: Compiling scanner
>> gnutls-scan.c:5:25: error: glib-object.h: No such file or directory
>> Clearly, it lacks `pkg-config glib-2.0 --cflags` as CFLAGS.
>> Unfortunately, I wasn't able to pinpoint the root of the problem.
>> Re-running `autoreconf' and `configure' didn't help. Any hint?
> Hm, which gtk-doc-tools version are you using?
I'm using 1.8-3 from Debian sid. I still haven't found any way around
> Btw, building fails in another way now:
> But I fixed this by adding a -I.
Perfect! Again, sorry about that.
Hopefully, this is all looking better now. Let me know if you notice
any other annoyance.
More information about the Gnutls-devel