releasing LGPL version of opencdk?
simon at josefsson.org
Sun Apr 13 11:58:27 CEST 2008
Timo Schulz <twoaday at gmx.net> writes:
> Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
>> Simon Josefsson wrote:
>>> Regarding naming, on second thought, I think it would be better to avoid
>>> having 'gnutls' in the name of the LGPL package since it would be
>>> confusing if any non-gnutls projects to link with it.
>> I also like the lite version better :)
> I've to agree, that the 'gnutls' part might confuse user.
> So it's settled, we use the 'libopencdk-lite' name :-).
It seems the savannah people do not like project names that contain
How do you feel about using 'freecdk'? This let us avoid the -lite
suffix which is nice. Or 'minicdk'?
More information about the Gnutls-devel