releasing LGPL version of opencdk?

[Timo Schulz]

Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> Simon Josefsson wrote:
> 
>> Regarding naming, on second thought, I think it would be better to avoid
>> having 'gnutls' in the name of the LGPL package since it would be
>> confusing if any non-gnutls projects to link with it.
>> 'libopencdk-lite'?
> 
> I also like the lite version better :)

I've to agree, that the 'gnutls' part might confuse user.
So it's settled, we use the 'libopencdk-lite' name :-).


	Timo