nmav at gnutls.org
Wed Dec 2 07:15:46 CET 2009
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Hi Nikos--
> On 12/01/2009 04:31 PM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
>> Due to some procedural issues  it is not possible to publish
>> RFC5081bis as independent submission. My last draft it at . I have
>> tried to publish it as AD-sponsored but the area director refuses to
>> publish it as informational. I see no reason to publish it again as
>> experimental, thus I give up. Is any of you interested in adopting this
> I don't know enough about the process in general or the history of this
> specific draft to be able to push it forward, though i'm interested in
> seeing it formalized. Presumably, the way around the procedural issues
> is to get the TLS WG to approve it, no?
Yes. The way to achieve that is to have people support it from the WG.
> Actually, it looks like 5081 was not a TLS WG RFC -- it shows up as a
> "Network Working Group" RFC here, anyway:
No it is a TLS WG. I don't know the network working group header but it
seems all TLS WG documents have it. Check:
for the TLS WG documents.
> Also, is there source for this draft? Are you working on it in plain
> text, or are you using the xml2rfc workflow?
I attached you in personal.
More information about the Gnutls-devel