rfc5081bis

[Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos]

Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Hi Nikos--
> 
> On 12/01/2009 04:31 PM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
>>  Due to some procedural issues [0] it is not possible to publish
>> RFC5081bis as independent submission. My last draft it at [1]. I have
>> tried to publish it as AD-sponsored but the area director refuses to
>> publish it as informational. I see no reason to publish it again as
>> experimental, thus I give up. Is any of you interested in adopting this
>> document?
> 
> I don't know enough about the process in general or the history of this
> specific draft to be able to push it forward, though i'm interested in
> seeing it formalized.  Presumably, the way around the procedural issues
> is to get the TLS WG to approve it, no?

Yes. The way to achieve that is to have people support it from the WG.

> Actually, it looks like 5081 was not a TLS WG RFC -- it shows up as a
> "Network Working Group" RFC here, anyway:

No it is a TLS WG. I don't know the network working group header but it
seems all TLS WG documents have it. Check:
http://www.ietf.org/dyn/wg/charter/tls-charter.html
for the TLS WG documents.

> Also, is there source for this draft?  Are you working on it in plain
> text, or are you using the xml2rfc workflow?

I attached you in personal.

regards,
Nikos