nmav at gnutls.org
Wed Dec 2 10:23:03 CET 2009
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
<dkg at fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
> OK, and what is the current consensus of that WG about 5081bis? can you
> give me some pointers to discussion to read? I only just subscribed to
> the TLS WG today, and the recent archives are understandably flooded
> with dealing with mitigation of the renegotiation flaw.
For RFC5081bis there wasn't any discussion since it was independent
submission. You can find discussion about the old RFC5081 at
and over older at:
> got it, thanks. i'm looking it over now. any reason to believe that
> the source itself should not be public? If i was going to take this
> over and drive it, are there any licensing/copyright concerns i would
> need to be aware of?
No not really, i just sent it in personal to reduce data on list.
More information about the Gnutls-devel