[sr #107522] Use of dangerous/banned functions
INVALID.NOREPLY at gnu.org
Wed Nov 17 15:34:04 CET 2010
Follow-up Comment #4, sr #107522 (project gnutls):
Do you have some concrete pointer to broken GnuTLS code? It would help to
make this discussion a bit more down to earth.
The strlcpy etc are as criticized as the strcpy functions, and I recall
decisions within gnulib to not provide portability wrappers for them because
it is not a good idea.
Reply to this item at:
Message sent via/by Savannah
More information about the Gnutls-devel