[sr #107522] Use of dangerous/banned functions

Simon Josefsson INVALID.NOREPLY at gnu.org
Wed Nov 17 15:34:04 CET 2010


Follow-up Comment #4, sr #107522 (project gnutls):

Do you have some concrete pointer to broken GnuTLS code?  It would help to
make this discussion a bit more down to earth.

The strlcpy etc are as criticized as the strcpy functions, and I recall
decisions within gnulib to not provide portability wrappers for them because
it is not a good idea.

/Simon


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/support/?107522>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/





More information about the Gnutls-devel mailing list