[sr #107522] Use of dangerous/banned functions
Simon Josefsson
INVALID.NOREPLY at gnu.org
Wed Nov 17 15:34:04 CET 2010
Follow-up Comment #4, sr #107522 (project gnutls):
Do you have some concrete pointer to broken GnuTLS code? It would help to
make this discussion a bit more down to earth.
The strlcpy etc are as criticized as the strcpy functions, and I recall
decisions within gnulib to not provide portability wrappers for them because
it is not a good idea.
/Simon
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/support/?107522>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
More information about the Gnutls-devel
mailing list