[sr #107527] Use of dangerous/banned functions (Analysis)

Jeffrey Walton noloader at gmail.com
Fri Nov 19 07:46:40 CET 2010

On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 1:35 AM, Simon Josefsson
<INVALID.NOREPLY at gnu.org> wrote:
> Follow-up Comment #1, sr #107527 (project gnutls):
> You make several points in this bug report, and it is difficult to followup
> on each one -- could you enumerate each problem you have identified?  Some of
> it is discussion, and that is more useful on the list.
> Also your line numbers are way off, you should use master unless you have
> found a clear security issue that must be fixed in the stable 2.10.x branch.
> We don't apply any non-critical fixes on the stable branch.
Gotcha. My apologies - path of least resistance.

I have not been able to complete a configure/make cycle on the
bleeding edge gear, and I like to limit my number of [dumb] questions
so the well does not dry up :(


More information about the Gnutls-devel mailing list