Documentation on W32
nmav at gnutls.org
Sat Sep 15 12:14:10 CEST 2012
On 09/15/2012 11:49 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 11:18:48 +0200
>> From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav at gnutls.org>
>> Cc: gnutls-devel at gnu.org
>> Is there any reason for not using mingw64-32 instead?
> Why would a package force its users into using only one particular
> brand of runtime?
The question is to determine whether there is a reason to actually
support mingw32 given the fact that's broken with several functions
More information about the Gnutls-devel