[gnutls-devel] BNF of priority strings
nmav at gnutls.org
Tue Jan 29 09:31:42 CET 2013
On 01/27/2013 09:17 AM, Jouko Orava wrote:
> I don't think that's necessary, as the code is quite straightforward and
> clean; aside from what I reported, I could see no anomalies or likely
> culprits. A lot of the code in gnutls_priority_init() repeats, after all.
> What I do suspect, though, is that most priority strings that are more
> complex than just a level, do not actually have the effects that the
> users think they have. The interaction with the separate priority lists
> and the resulting cipher suite set is quite complex, when the priority
> string contains both additions and removals.
Yes, that needs to be fixed.
More information about the Gnutls-devel