tim.ruehsen at gmx.de
Thu Jul 28 17:01:44 CEST 2016
On Thursday, July 28, 2016 5:51:22 PM CEST Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <n.mavrogiannopoulos at gmail.com>
> > Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 11:21:08 +0200
> > Cc: GnuTLS development list <gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org>, Eli Zaretskii
> > <eliz at gnu.org>,>
> > Ludovic Courtès <ludo at gnu.org>
> > It's funny that C99 was always a considered a new thing as long as I
> > can remember. I think after 17 years is time to consider it something
> > old and support it by default :)
> Latest versions of GCC do.
Many of the 1990ies GCC extensions went into the C99 standard.
So maybe even very old (20+ years) versions of GCC are good enough - but
really... anyone using GCC 3.x to compile 2016 C sources ?
I still use 2.95.3 for one customer (and I guess even 2.7 on an old SCO
development system - but used rarely and thus currently down)... but hey, I
would never even try to compile GnuTLS 5.3.x there :-))
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the Gnutls-devel