[gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | WIP: Fix check_if_signed (!964)

Development of GNU's TLS library gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org
Mon Apr 1 09:29:52 CEST 2019

I think adding the upstream as remote is the less error prone; on personal forks there is not much incentive to keep an up-to-date master so we may not be able to rely on it being recent or even existing at all. @rockdaboot what do you think?

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/merge_requests/964#note_155922192
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-devel/attachments/20190401/7cf728e1/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Gnutls-devel mailing list