[gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | Two integer overflows in priority.c (#679)

Development of GNU's TLS library gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org
Wed Jan 23 15:39:34 CET 2019

Sorry, I'm not really convinced, though the patch indeed looks cleaner.

My concern is that it could actually be more costly, when the majority of the items are TLS 1.2 and if we can assume that `REMOVE_TLS13_IN_LOOP` works in amortized constant time (with the help of compiler optimization).

However, given that the array wouldn't contain millions of items, that probably wouldn't matter.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/issues/679#note_134165650
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-devel/attachments/20190123/c6265549/attachment.html>

More information about the Gnutls-devel mailing list