From gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org Sat Nov 1 13:54:36 2025 From: gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org (Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities) Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2025 12:54:36 +0000 Subject: [gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | Add missing parameter documentation in lib/audit.c (!2037) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Karthik Das commented: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2037#note_2861016403 @dueno Pls review and let me know if I am missing anything. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2037#note_2861016403 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org Tue Nov 4 11:18:05 2025 From: gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org (Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2025 10:18:05 +0000 Subject: [gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | aarch64: Enable GCS (!2038) References: Message-ID: GUILLAUME GARDET created a merge request: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2038 Project:Branches: ggardet/gnutls:master to gnutls/gnutls:master Author: GUILLAUME GARDET When building with GCC15+, binutils 2.44+, glibc 2.41+ and `-mbranch-protection=standard` on (openSUSE Tumbleweed) aarch64, this enables PAC, BTI and GCS (Guarded Control Stack). For GCS, we need to add some gnu properties when assembler code is used, similarly to what we already did for PAC/BTI. More details on GCS: * https://community.arm.com/arm-community-blogs/b/tools-software-ides-blog/posts/gcc-15-continuously-improving#guarded * https://docs.kernel.org/next/arch/arm64/gcs.html Please note aarch64 assembler code will need to be regenerated after this patch. ## Checklist * [ ] Commits have `Signed-off-by:` with name/author being identical to the commit author * [ ] Code modified for feature * [ ] Test suite updated with functionality tests * [ ] Test suite updated with negative tests * [ ] Documentation updated / NEWS entry present (for non-trivial changes) ## Reviewer's checklist: * [ ] Any issues marked for closing are addressed * [ ] There is a test suite reasonably covering new functionality or modifications * [ ] Function naming, parameters, return values, types, etc., are consistent and according to `CONTRIBUTION.md` * [ ] This feature/change has adequate documentation added * [ ] No obvious mistakes in the code -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2038 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org Tue Nov 4 17:00:19 2025 From: gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org (Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2025 16:00:19 +0000 Subject: [gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | Add positive value check for preventing NULL Pointer Dereference (#1759) References: Message-ID: 7erry created an issue: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/issues/1759 ## [CVE-2021-4209](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-4209) `wrap_nettle_hash_fast` in `lib/nettle/mac.c` once caused NULL Pointer Dereference reported as CVE-2021-4209 and was fixed in Commit 3db3527 ## Similar issues Each of the following functions contains a similar logic - `wrap_aarch64_hmac_fast` in `lib/accelerated/aarch64/hmac-sha-aarch64.c` - `wrap_aarch64_hash_fast` in `lib/accelerated/aarch64/sha-aarch64.c` - `wrap_x86_hmac_fast` in `lib/accelerated/x86/hmac-x86-ssse3.c` - `wrap_x86_hash_fast` in `lib/accelerated/x86/sha-x86-ssse3.c` - `wrap_nettle_mac_fast` in `lib/nettle/mac.c` Would it make sense to fix them in the same way Commit 3db3527 did? Thank you for spending your time reading this issue. Apologies if I missed anything.`` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/issues/1759 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org Wed Nov 5 02:58:13 2025 From: gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org (Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities) Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2025 01:58:13 +0000 Subject: [gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | Add positive value check for preventing NULL Pointer Dereference (#1759) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Daiki Ueno commented: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/issues/1759#note_2867906915 Thank you for the report. However, now that the issue has been [fixed](https://git.lysator.liu.se/nettle/nettle/-/commit/99e62003c3916fdef04a2d3327281f8f498b609e) in Nettle itself, I don't see much benefit of fixing them by ourselves. We could instead bump the Nettle requirement to 3.10 or later. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/issues/1759#note_2867906915 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org Thu Nov 6 15:38:59 2025 From: gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org (Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities) Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2025 14:38:59 +0000 Subject: [gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | Assorted build fixes and improvements (!2036) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Alexander Sosedkin commented: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2036#note_2872399219 not sure if it's worth to make a NEWS entry for packagers stating "if you used `--sysconfdir`, it's now respected for default config location". maybe not. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2036#note_2872399219 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org Thu Nov 6 15:39:06 2025 From: gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org (Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities) Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2025 14:39:06 +0000 Subject: [gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | Assorted build fixes and improvements (!2036) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Merge request !2036 was approved by Alexander Sosedkin Merge request URL: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2036 Project:Branches: dueno/gnutls:wip/dueno/usretc to gnutls/gnutls:master Author: Daiki Ueno Assignees: Reviewers: -- You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org Thu Nov 6 16:42:04 2025 From: gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org (Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities) Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2025 15:42:04 +0000 Subject: [gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | mem: define symbol aliases for memory allocation functions (!2033) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Merge request https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2033 was reviewed by Alexander Sosedkin -- Alexander Sosedkin started a new discussion on lib/libgnutls.map: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2033#note_2872594342 > gnutls_audit_pop_context; > gnutls_audit_current_context; > + gnutls_secure_malloc; why is it in the `GNUTLS_3_8_6` -- `GNUTLS_3_8_11` section? shouldn't it get split up into more of them? -- Alexander Sosedkin started a new discussion on devel/symbols.last: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2033#note_2872594366 > gnutls_bye at GNUTLS_3_4 > -gnutls_calloc at GNUTLS_3_4 > +gnutls_calloc@(GNUTLS_3_4) do I understand correctly that the parentheses are an artifact of `objdump -T` output, signifying it's not a default version of the symbol? do we want it reflected in this file or do we want them stripped maybe? -- Alexander Sosedkin started a new discussion on lib/mem.c: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2033#note_2872594389 > - * gnutls_global_set_mem_functions(). > + * This function should be used to deallocate memory if the library > + * allocate it. s/allocate/allocates/ -- Alexander Sosedkin started a new discussion on devel/libgnutls.abignore: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2033#note_2872594412 > [suppress_function] > name = gnutls_psk_allocate_server_credentials2 > + the order of commits seems backwards to me, is it only merge commits that are supposed to be testable? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2033 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org Thu Nov 6 23:13:04 2025 From: gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org (Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities) Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2025 22:13:04 +0000 Subject: [gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | Assorted build fixes and improvements (!2036) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Daiki Ueno commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2036#note_2873564662 Good point, I'll include it in the 3.8.11 release notes. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2036#note_2873564662 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org Thu Nov 6 23:13:10 2025 From: gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org (Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities) Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2025 22:13:10 +0000 Subject: [gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | Assorted build fixes and improvements (!2036) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: All discussions on merge request !2036 were resolved by Daiki Ueno https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2036 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2036 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org Thu Nov 6 23:13:25 2025 From: gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org (Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities) Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2025 22:13:25 +0000 Subject: [gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | Assorted build fixes and improvements (!2036) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Daiki Ueno commented: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2036#note_2873565193 Thank you for the review! -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2036#note_2873565193 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org Thu Nov 6 23:13:32 2025 From: gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org (Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities) Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2025 22:13:32 +0000 Subject: [gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | Assorted build fixes and improvements (!2036) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Merge request !2036 was merged Merge request URL: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2036 Project:Branches: dueno/gnutls:wip/dueno/usretc to gnutls/gnutls:master Author: Daiki Ueno -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2036 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org Thu Nov 6 23:37:28 2025 From: gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org (Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities) Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2025 22:37:28 +0000 Subject: [gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | Add positive value check for preventing NULL Pointer Dereference (#1759) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Issue was closed by Daiki Ueno Issue #1759: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/issues/1759 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/issues/1759 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org Fri Nov 7 01:46:20 2025 From: gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org (Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities) Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2025 00:46:20 +0000 Subject: [gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | mem: define symbol aliases for memory allocation functions (!2033) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Daiki Ueno commented on a discussion on devel/symbols.last: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2033#note_2873711572 > gnutls_base64_encode2 at GNUTLS_3_6_0 > gnutls_buffer_append_data at GNUTLS_3_4 > gnutls_bye at GNUTLS_3_4 > -gnutls_calloc at GNUTLS_3_4 > +gnutls_calloc@(GNUTLS_3_4) @ametzler do you know? Afaik the symbols file is for Debian. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2033#note_2873711572 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org Fri Nov 7 09:52:48 2025 From: gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org (Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities) Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2025 08:52:48 +0000 Subject: [gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | mem: define symbol aliases for memory allocation functions (!2033) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Daiki Ueno commented on a discussion on lib/libgnutls.map: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2033#note_2874250453 > gnutls_audit_push_context; > gnutls_audit_pop_context; > gnutls_audit_current_context; > + gnutls_secure_malloc; Not sure if I get it right, but there were no new symbols introduced between 3.8.6 and 3.8.10, and the first version since then, that will have new symbols is 3.8.11. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2033#note_2874250453 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org Fri Nov 7 09:54:19 2025 From: gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org (Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities) Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2025 08:54:19 +0000 Subject: [gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | mem: define symbol aliases for memory allocation functions (!2033) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Daiki Ueno commented on a discussion on devel/libgnutls.abignore: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2033#note_2874253591 > > [suppress_function] > name = gnutls_psk_allocate_server_credentials2 > + "make abi-check-latest" check runs abidiff in the reverse order, because it doesn't treat addition of symbols as an error. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2033#note_2874253591 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org Fri Nov 7 15:51:03 2025 From: gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org (Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities) Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2025 14:51:03 +0000 Subject: [gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | Draft: CI: move to Fedora 42 (!2039) References: Message-ID: Alexander Sosedkin created a merge request: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2039 Project:Branches: asosedkin/gnutls:ci-f42 to gnutls/gnutls:master Author: Alexander Sosedkin Comes with multiple other assorted fixes, the CI isn't entirely green yet. Here's an incomplete list of known remaining issues (though not exactly Fedora 42-provoked): * documentation generation needs at least !2037 * cross- jobs need privileged runners + somehow binfmt_misc doesn't work even then on Debian, but seems to work fine on Fedora. would consider moving CI runners to Fedora * tests are sometimes flaky by themselves ## Checklist * [x] Commits have `Signed-off-by:` with name/author being identical to the commit author * [ ] Code modified for feature * [ ] Test suite updated with functionality tests * [ ] Test suite updated with negative tests * [ ] Documentation updated / NEWS entry present (for non-trivial changes) ## Reviewer's checklist: * [ ] Any issues marked for closing are addressed * [ ] There is a test suite reasonably covering new functionality or modifications * [ ] Function naming, parameters, return values, types, etc., are consistent and according to `CONTRIBUTION.md` * [ ] This feature/change has adequate documentation added * [ ] No obvious mistakes in the code -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2039 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org Fri Nov 7 19:26:22 2025 From: gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org (Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities) Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2025 18:26:22 +0000 Subject: [gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | mem: define symbol aliases for memory allocation functions (!2033) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Andreas Metzler commented on a discussion on devel/symbols.last: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2033#note_2875656702 > gnutls_base64_encode2 at GNUTLS_3_6_0 > gnutls_buffer_append_data at GNUTLS_3_4 > gnutls_bye at GNUTLS_3_4 > -gnutls_calloc at GNUTLS_3_4 > +gnutls_calloc@(GNUTLS_3_4) Afaict the file is used for Makefile.am's symbol-check target, for checking unwanted API breakage. The check compares current and saved "objdump -T "output. (A light weight abi-check.) It is not used by Debian. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2033#note_2875656702 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org Sun Nov 9 11:59:13 2025 From: gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org (Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2025 10:59:13 +0000 Subject: [gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | timedatectl list the ntp ip/host it is using (#1760) References: Message-ID: Johannes kingma created an issue: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/work_items/1760 ## Description of the feature: Currently timedatectl shows it is using an ntp server. It is not telling which one. ``` # timedatectl status Local time: Sun 2025-11-09 11:56:42 CET Universal time: Sun 2025-11-09 10:56:42 UTC RTC time: Sun 2025-11-09 10:56:42 Time zone: Europe/Zurich (CET, +0100) System clock synchronized: yes NTP service: active RTC in local TZ: no ``` ## Applications that this feature may be relevant to: It would be helpful in troubleshooting scenarios. Example output: ``` # timedatectl status Local time: Sun 2025-11-09 11:56:42 CET Universal time: Sun 2025-11-09 10:56:42 UTC RTC time: Sun 2025-11-09 10:56:42 Time zone: Europe/Zurich (CET, +0100) System clock synchronized: yes NTP service: active (ntp.example.com:123) RTC in local TZ: no ``` ## Is this feature implemented in other libraries (and which) -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/work_items/1760 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org Sun Nov 9 13:01:39 2025 From: gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org (Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2025 12:01:39 +0000 Subject: [gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | timedatectl list the ntp ip/host it is using (#1760) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Andreas Metzler commented: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/work_items/1760#note_2876977910 I think you got the wrong bug-tracker, **timedatectl** is not part of GnuTLS. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/work_items/1760#note_2876977910 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org Sun Nov 9 13:01:43 2025 From: gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org (Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2025 12:01:43 +0000 Subject: [gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | timedatectl list the ntp ip/host it is using (#1760) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Issue was closed by Andreas Metzler Issue #1760: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/work_items/1760 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/work_items/1760 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org Tue Nov 11 18:18:50 2025 From: gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org (Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 17:18:50 +0000 Subject: [gnutls-devel] libtasn1 | Ongoing security disclosure access (#56) References: Message-ID: Vijay Sarvepalli created an issue: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/libtasn1/-/issues/56 Hello libtasn1 Team, We have had interactions with Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos @nmav on libtasn1 security report. Can you please give me access to it? I am from CERT/CC helping with Coordination of this security issue. It is tracked in CERT/CC with private id 271649 Thanks Vijay Sarvepalli Principal Engineer CERT/CC Vulnerability Team -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/libtasn1/-/issues/56 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org Thu Nov 13 11:59:42 2025 From: gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org (Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 10:59:42 +0000 Subject: [gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | Add missing parameter documentation in lib/audit.c (!2037) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Franti?ek Kren?elok commented: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2037#note_2886377048 This look good, and the bug is pretty annoying... Approving but rerun your pipeline with higher timeout, although the change is trivial it is always good to get at least the commit checked. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2037#note_2886377048 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org Thu Nov 13 11:59:53 2025 From: gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org (Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 10:59:53 +0000 Subject: [gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | Add missing parameter documentation in lib/audit.c (!2037) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Merge request !2037 was approved by Franti?ek Kren?elok Merge request URL: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2037 Project:Branches: devkdas/gnutls:master to gnutls/gnutls:master Author: Karthik Das Assignees: Reviewers: -- You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org Thu Nov 13 12:02:28 2025 From: gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org (Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 11:02:28 +0000 Subject: [gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | Add missing parameter documentation in lib/audit.c (!2037) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Franti?ek Kren?elok commented: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2037#note_2886384047 Suggested steps: 1. increase your CI timeout 2. rebase on top just to be safe 3. force push -> pipeline starts again Thanks for the contribution! -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2037#note_2886384047 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org Fri Nov 14 08:09:00 2025 From: gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org (Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 07:09:00 +0000 Subject: [gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | Add missing parameter documentation in lib/audit.c (!2037) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Karthik Das commented: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2037#note_2888507875 This is very trival small @FrantisekKrenzelok. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2037#note_2888507875 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: