<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd">

<html lang="en">

<head>

<meta content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII" http-equiv="Content-Type">

<title>

GitLab

</title>

<style>img {

max-width: 100%; height: auto;

}

</style>

</head>

<body>

<div class="content">

<div style="">

<p dir="auto">I understand, the report is for using hmac_copy for a replacement API in gnome. What I probably should have said, is that seeing this functionality in isolation for HMAC, wouldn't it make the hash and HMAC APIs imbalanced? I.e., do we have a reason not to provide the copy in hash, if we provide it in HMAC? (doesn't necessarily need to be part of this MR, we can only note this as something to address in the future)</p>

</div>

</div>

<div class="footer" style="margin-top: 10px;">

<p style="font-size: small; color: #777;">

—

<br>

Reply to this email directly or <a href="https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/merge_requests/1035#note_185130841">view it on GitLab</a>.

<br>

You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com.

If you'd like to receive fewer emails, you can

<a href="https://gitlab.com/sent_notifications/915f1aaafa58823584cf9846e6311dd6/unsubscribe">unsubscribe</a>

from this thread or

adjust your notification settings.

<script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"http://schema.org","@type":"EmailMessage","action":{"@type":"ViewAction","name":"View Merge request","url":"https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/merge_requests/1035#note_185130841"}}</script>

</p>

</div>

</body>

</html>