[Help-gnutls] GnuTLS 2.2.1 memory leaks or just bad usage?
Daniel Stenberg
daniel at haxx.se
Sat Feb 16 22:48:54 CET 2008
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
>> Then, yes it _does_ fix the worst leaks in my test case. The reamining leak
>> now looks like this (with a build using only -g and not -O2 that otherwise
>> confuse symbols like the ones in my initial report):
>>
>> ==13872== 128 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 2 of 8
> What about this patch? It's quite intrusive. My development environment is
> almost inexistent now, thus I'd appreciate if you or any other volunteers
> could test it.
Bingo! No leak left in this test case with this patch applied - I did apply it
over the previous one you posted, I got one reject but that turned out to be
because that was already changed in the previous patch.
More information about the Gnutls-help
mailing list