[Help-gnutls] GnuTLS 2.2.1 memory leaks or just bad usage?

Daniel Stenberg daniel at haxx.se
Sat Feb 16 22:48:54 CET 2008

On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:

>> Then, yes it _does_ fix the worst leaks in my test case. The reamining leak 
>> now looks like this (with a build using only -g and not -O2 that otherwise 
>> confuse symbols like the ones in my initial report):
>> ==13872== 128 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 2 of 8

> What about this patch? It's quite intrusive. My development environment is 
> almost inexistent now, thus I'd appreciate if you or any other volunteers 
> could test it.

Bingo! No leak left in this test case with this patch applied - I did apply it 
over the previous one you posted, I got one reject but that turned out to be 
because that was already changed in the previous patch.

More information about the Gnutls-help mailing list