leak?

[Mike Blumenkrantz]

On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 17:48:57 +0100
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav at gnutls.org> wrote:

> On 11/03/2010 05:29 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I've been valgrinding some of my gnutls-using apps and have found what
> > appears to be a small leak in the handshaking code (using 2.10.2).
> > ecore_con_ssl.c can be found here:
> > https://svn.enlightenment.org/svn/e/trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore_con/ecore_con_ssl.c
> > 
> > ==19053== 1,024 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 146 of
> > 160 ==19053==    at 0x4027A66: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
> > ==19053==    by 0x40B77D4: _gnutls_send_client_hello
> > (gnutls_handshake.c:1985) ==19053==    by 0x40B8253: _gnutls_send_hello
> > (gnutls_handshake.c:2299) ==19053==    by 0x40B9037:
> > _gnutls_handshake_client (gnutls_handshake.c:2775) ==19053==    by
> > 0x40B8F0D: gnutls_handshake (gnutls_handshake.c:2699) ==19053==    by
> > 0x4055063: _ecore_con_ssl_server_init_gnutls (ecore_con_ssl.c:515)
> > 
> > 
> > This leak occurs client side every single time I handshake.
> 
> Thanks it seems it was introduced with 2.10 and eliminated again in
> 2.11. Anyway, does the following patch solve the issue for you?
> 
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnutls.git;a=commitdiff;h=f48cb4e387e0b89627310499ce5d80b3063a5ee2
> 
> regards,
> Nikos
It does indeed fix the leak.

-- 
Mike Blumenkrantz
Zentific: Our boolean values are huge.