ssl connection issues
mike at zentific.com
Fri Oct 1 00:24:08 CEST 2010
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 07:00:42 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <raster at rasterman.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:25:46 -0400 Michael Blumenkrantz <mike at zentific.com>
> > On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:12:54 +0200
> > Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav at gnutls.org> wrote:
> > > On 09/30/2010 09:32 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > >
> > > > 2.10.2 fixes it! Excellent! Is there any way that this async fix can be
> > > > backported to the 2.8 branch? A very large portion of the EFL's users
> > > > rely on that branch and have not moved to 2.10 yet.
> > >
> > > They are compatible so I think moving to 2.10 is pretty straight forward.
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > Nikos
> > Indeed, however on platforms such as mobile or embedded, only the 2.8 series
> > may be available.
> there is nothing u can do if all u have is 2.8 - u are stuck. the binary is
> already there. a backport would mean a rebuild and update/change of the
> shipped 2.8... and that would mean you can just as well move to 2.10 anyway
> with less work (is 2.10 doesnt break anything).
Ah, I thought that they had just been staying on that series. Nevermind then!
Zentific: Our boolean values are huge.
More information about the Gnutls-help