[gnutls-help] libgnutls undefined reference
nmav at gnutls.org
Mon Feb 29 21:29:19 CET 2016
On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 18:28 +0200, Anton wrote:
> I have already built nettle with secp192 and secp224 curves support.
> It was wrong decision and I should consider secp192 and secp224
> curves as insecure?
I do not believe that the Fedora/RHEL decision not to include secp192
and secp224 was related to security. Given today's situation though
supporting the 192 and 224 curves doesn't provide much of an advantage.
More information about the Gnutls-help