libassuan troubles

[Michael Nottebrock]

On Monday 19 April 2004 16:34, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:

> This seems spurious.  Maybe putc_unlocked is only defined as a macro
> on BSD, and thus circumvents the autoconf tests?  This would sound
> broken to me (it may be allowed to define it as a macro, but it should
> still be defined as a function in the library).

Yes, it's a macro. However, I don't see what's wrong about that other than 
making autoconf's life harder.

-- 
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi at freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: signature
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20040419/b3d07f34/attachment.bin