gpg agent difficulty

[Bernhard Reiter]

On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 11:15:05AM +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 21:25:09 +0200, Ingo Klöcker said:
> 
> > Yeah, and everybody (I'm talking about fellow KDE developers and not 
> > about users) apart from Marc (and probably a few others who know the 
> > secret incantation) seems to be unable to make KMail work with the new 
> > stuff. The old stuff OTOH still works perfectly for me and some other 
> 
> The gpg-agent from newpg has serious flaws and I really wonder how you
> all can life with it.  gnupg 1.9 is a replcement for newpg since
> December and I can't remember any critical bugs reported then.  I
> assumed everyone is using that for a long time now.

Maybe that is the problem then.
We need more bug reports and also more usage.

Ingo: What were the problems with gnupg1.9. in particular?
Do we have them in the bugtracker already?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20040719/8c824a5b/attachment.bin