gpgme license
Marcus Brinkmann
marcus.brinkmann at ruhr-uni-bochum.de
Tue Sep 21 20:53:36 CEST 2004
Werner expressed his views on LGPL'ing GPGME publicly last time here:
http://www.advogato.org/article/685.html
Now, this is already a year old, and doesn't concern the Qt exemption
you are proposing as an alternative. Maybe Werner wants to say more
about that.
At Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:21:14 +0200,
Marc Mutz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since the Aegypten-2 project, we committed ourselves to use gpgme in KDEPIM to
> interface to gnupg 1.x (and pre-2.0).
>
> Unfortunately, this conflicts with the possibility to have KDEPIM native on
> Windows. The problem here is of course that Qt on Windows is not available in
> a GPL version, and the alternative cygwin solution is considered by many to
> not be native enough to compete with native Windows solutions.
>
> So on behalf of the KDEPIM team I'd like to ask the gpgme team to consider a
> change in the license of gpgme. We would be interested in having either the
> Qt exception added (see below for the exact wording (same as the one
> suggested in the FSF FAQ)), or go the full way and have it LGPL.
>
> The benfits for gpgme/gnupg would be a chance to gain in the size of the user
> base. As we have seen during Aegypten-2, KDEPIM using gpgme seriously let to
> a lot of bug fixes and portability fixes for gpgme being posted back upstream
> from libgpgme-copy in KDEPIM CVS. The change in usebase from Unix to Windows
> could have a similar effect on the stability and portability of gpgme.
>
> What are your thoughts on this issue?
>
> Qt exception as is is currently worded in KMail:
> In addition, as a special exception, the copyright holders give
> permission to link the code of this program with any edition of
> the Qt library by Trolltech AS, Norway (or with modified versions
> of Qt that use the same license as Qt), and distribute linked
> combinations including the two. You must obey the GNU General
> Public License in all respects for all of the code used other than
> Qt. If you modify this file, you may extend this exception to
> your version of the file, but you are not obligated to do so. If
> you do not wish to do so, delete this exception statement from
> your version.
>
> Marc
>
> --
> Marc Mutz -- marc at klaralvdalens-datakonsult.se, mutz at kde.org
> Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB, Platform-independent software solutions
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gpa-dev mailing list
> Gpa-dev at gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gpa-dev
>
More information about the Gpa-dev
mailing list