Reading new key packages (Re: Coexistence with OpenPGP/IETF)

[Andrew Gallagher]

On 2 Jan 2024, at 15:09, Werner Koch <wk at gnupg.org> wrote:
> 
> On Tue,  2 Jan 2024 14:32, Andrew Gallagher said:
> 
>> scheme for v4 and v6 because it only requires one implementation and
>> not two. Is there any technical problem with this idea?
> 
> Complexity.

Are you saying that implementing the same integrity check method for both v4 and v6 sigs is *more* complex than the alternative? I don’t understand...

A

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <https://librepgp.org/pipermail/librepgp-discuss/attachments/20240102/267bbbbc/attachment.sig>