Reading new key packages (Re: Coexistence with OpenPGP/IETF)

[Werner Koch]

On Sun,  7 Jan 2024 18:28, Andrew Gallagher said:

> 3. Gnupg/librepgp would like to implement v6 sigs but will not do so
> without metadata protection

The only reason for this is to allow for a longer subpacket area.  This
_might_ eventually be useful but I am not sure whether this will be
needed any time soon.  This is why I tried to implement this and at that
opportunity figured that the meta data hashing was removed.


Shalom-Salam,

   Werner

-- 
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service.             - A. Einstein
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 247 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://librepgp.org/pipermail/librepgp-discuss/attachments/20240108/ae268539/attachment.sig>