-lresolv, designated revoker with GnuPG 1.1.92
jharris at widomaker.com
Fri Sep 13 20:54:01 CEST 2002
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 12:26:16AM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:36:06PM -0400, Jason Harris wrote:
> > Doh! I forgot to mention this before: -lresolv isn't needed for FreeBSD.
> What did ./configure display for the "Checking whether LDAP via "xxxx"
> is present and sane" line? Is the issue here that configure included
> -lresolv, and it wasn't necessary but it caused no harm (aside from
> the obvious linking to something unneeded)?
With -lresolv, gpgkeys_ldap isn't built on FreeBSD. There is no
> > Also, should a valid revocation signature made by a designated revoker
> > be followed by "-" instead of "!":
> Cosmetic bug. Fixed.
(Cool, now I won't have to look for "[revoked]." :)
Jason Harris | NIC: JH329, PGP: This _is_ PGP-signed, isn't it?
jharris at widomaker.com | web: http://jharris.cjb.net/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20020913/b3ac5205/attachment.bin
More information about the Gnupg-devel