libgcrypt/tests/Makefile.am patch

[Bob Friesenhahn]

You are right there is indeed another problem.  There is an incorrect 
assuption that libgcrypt_la_DEPENDENCIES has something to do with 
libtool and library dependencies when in fact it does not.

Perhaps libgcrypt_la_LDADD should be used instead?

Bob

On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Moritz Schulte wrote:

> At Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:00:07 -0500 (CDT), Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>
> [I'm redirecting this thread to gcrypt-devel@, which seems to be more
> appropriate to me]
>
> Hello,
>
>> Libgcrypt does not completely build under Solaris due to a missing
>> Makefile.am library dependency.
>
> I wonder wether this is the correct patch; after all, Libtool
> libraries (*.la) should keep track of such library dependencies
> themselves.
>
> src/Makefile.am contains:
>
> libgcrypt_la_DEPENDENCIES = ../cipher/libcipher.la ../mpi/libmpi.la \
> 	$(srcdir)/libgcrypt.vers
>
> Therefore, linking against libgcrypt.la should imply linking against
> libcipher.la and libmpi.la.  When speaking of libmpi.la: I also wonder
> why, assuming that your dependencies are broken, you don't have to add
> libmpi.la to the LDADD line as well.
>
> Thanks,
> Moritz
>

======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen at simple.dallas.tx.us
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen