Problem building 1.4.5
vapier.adi at gmail.com
Mon Jun 21 18:24:17 CEST 2010
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 09:28, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 19:14, vapier.adi at gmail.com said:
>> even if you change the ABI, symbol hiding isnt really necessary. the
>> only functions you've guaranteed to be in the ABI are the ones you've
> The version script allows to implement several ABIs. Thus we can modify
> an API or remobing it without tocuhing the ABI. Checkout glibc to see
> how this can be useful.
i dont classify versioning symbols quite that way, but it's just
semantics i guess
>> as soon as you use a version script to give to binutils, libtool takes
>> no part in the symbol munging. had you used -export-symbols or
> Well it could munge the version script for us or pass an appropriate
> option to ld ;-).
this is treading pretty ugly territory though. you want libtool to
parse a pretty free form file like the version script given to ld and
mung it ? if the file had strict rules about syntax, then /maybe/ ...
at any rate, if we sent a patch that turned src/libgcrypt.vers into a
src/libgcrypt.vers.in and then ran `sed` on it, would you guys take it
More information about the Gcrypt-devel