[PATCH] Truncate hash values for ECDSA signature scheme
Werner Koch
wk at gnupg.org
Mon Dec 16 20:23:15 CET 2013
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:05, dbaryshkov at gmail.com said:
> Note: we are truncating hash, so there should be no difference in truncating
> LSB or MSB. Both should be equally distributed.
But that would we incompatible. I have not checked but it might be that
we do the truncation in GnuPG. Needs to be further researched.
Would you mind to open a ticket for this?
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
More information about the Gcrypt-devel
mailing list