[PATCH] Truncate hash values for ECDSA signature scheme

Werner Koch wk at gnupg.org
Mon Dec 16 20:23:15 CET 2013

On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:05, dbaryshkov at gmail.com said:

> Note: we are truncating hash, so there should be no difference in truncating
> LSB or MSB. Both should be equally distributed.

But that would we incompatible.  I have not checked but it might be that
we do the truncation in GnuPG.  Needs to be further researched.

Would you mind to open a ticket for this?



Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.

More information about the Gcrypt-devel mailing list