[PATCH] Truncate hash values for ECDSA signature scheme
dbaryshkov at gmail.com
Mon Dec 16 20:57:00 CET 2013
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Werner Koch <wk at gnupg.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:05, dbaryshkov at gmail.com said:
>> Note: we are truncating hash, so there should be no difference in truncating
>> LSB or MSB. Both should be equally distributed.
> But that would we incompatible. I have not checked but it might be that
> we do the truncation in GnuPG. Needs to be further researched.
> Would you mind to open a ticket for this?
With best wishes
More information about the Gcrypt-devel