Sexp changes between 1.5.3 and 1.6.0
wk at gnupg.org
Thu Jan 30 12:51:33 CET 2014
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:03, ludo at gnu.org said:
> Werner Koch <wk at gnupg.org> skribis:
>> On Sat, 21 Dec 2013 21:15, ludo at gnu.org said:
>>> (BTW, as a Schemer, it took me a while to understand that car and nth do
>>> not correspond to their traditional Lisp counterpart: the Lisp car and
>>> nth return the given element, regardless of whether it is a list or an
>> Well, that is a bug and it is related to your reproted bug 1594. I have
>> now fixed it in master and will backport it to 1.6:
> OK, thanks. The fix is not in 1.6.1, is it? (I didn’t see mention of
> it in the announcement.)
Sure it is in 1.6.1: 8ca59661.
> Which spec are you referring to here?
> <http://people.csail.mit.edu/rivest/Sexp.txt> doesn’t specify ‘car’,
I meant that there are only lists and the lists may not be empty.
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
More information about the Gcrypt-devel