Sexp changes between 1.5.3 and 1.6.0

Werner Koch wk at gnupg.org
Thu Jan 30 12:51:33 CET 2014


On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:03, ludo at gnu.org said:
> Werner Koch <wk at gnupg.org> skribis:
>
>> On Sat, 21 Dec 2013 21:15, ludo at gnu.org said:
>>
>>> (BTW, as a Schemer, it took me a while to understand that car and nth do
>>> not correspond to their traditional Lisp counterpart: the Lisp car and
>>> nth return the given element, regardless of whether it is a list or an
>>
>> Well, that is a bug and it is related to your reproted bug 1594.  I have
>> now fixed it in master and will backport it to 1.6:
>
> OK, thanks.  The fix is not in 1.6.1, is it?  (I didn’t see mention of
> it in the announcement.)

Sure it is in 1.6.1: 8ca59661.

> Which spec are you referring to here?
> <http://people.csail.mit.edu/rivest/Sexp.txt> doesn’t specify ‘car’,

I meant that there are only lists and the lists may not be empty.


Shalom-Salam,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.




More information about the Gcrypt-devel mailing list