LGPL vs. OCB license

[Kristian Fiskerstrand]

On 12/15/2017 06:09 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> I'm not deep into the crypto design at all, but is there a way to
> exclude to usage of this implementation during runtime?

Would presumably be even better to make this a compile time switch.

In addition to the debian bug referenced I've opened a similar bug for
Gentoo at https://bugs.gentoo.org/641160 , we will need to figure out
how to handle it there as well.

-- 
----------------------------
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Blog: https://blog.sumptuouscapital.com
Twitter: @krifisk
----------------------------
Public OpenPGP keyblock at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
----------------------------
"If you cannot convince them, confuse them"
(Harry S Truman)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gcrypt-devel/attachments/20171215/a838e1c4/attachment.sig>